| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Petition of no confidence against corbexx of CSM10 - in Wormholes [original thread]
WH dudes didnt elect him he was on the CFC ballot you big dummy, theres nothing that says a CSM cant change corps or alliances during his term that would be dumb, sorry about your spaceship council.
- by Princess Cherista - at 2015.03.22 21:01:27
|
2. Sticky:Dev blog: Back Into the Structure - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Can you just remove the ESS since nobody uses it anymore because its too much of a hassle, it doesnt generate any fights or meaningful gameplay.
- by Princess Cherista - at 2015.03.21 15:12:13
|
3. Let's talk about Capitals and Supercapitals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Capitals in highsec is ridiclulous, they are balanced around being able to be engaged and killed at any time in 0.0 They would become the default lvl 4 boat and of course the station campers delight.
- by Princess Cherista - at 2015.03.21 01:37:15
|
4. Divided null sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sibyyl wrote: Brave are a SOV holding alliance who came up from nothing. Look for the tiny pink bubble decent sized yellow (yay! yellow \o/) blob in the SOV map. There were other factors involved, like big alliances funding Brave to burn cer...
- by Princess Cherista - at 2015.03.15 06:59:07
|
5. Trojan in EVE Cache Backup - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
Today while doing a regularly scheduled virus scan my AV detected a trojan in my eve cache. http://imgur.com/xYjYNnP
I am curious if anyone else has encountered this maybe we can compare what tools/third party things we use for EVE. Off the t...
- by Princess Cherista - at 2015.03.13 03:28:08
|
6. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
SilentAsTheGrave wrote: Is there a way we can shift the focus of the thread towards anything BUT interceptors for a while Well its a good system except for the whole entosis link on uncatchable inties thing.
- by Princess Cherista - at 2015.03.12 03:59:08
|
7. #Superopcalypse 2015 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think they should be more closely aligned with RL carriers. If you look at a US Navy carrier or supercarrier, it is a mobile base that can transport about 200 fighter craft anywhere in the world. An EVE Online supercarrier should have an super-...
- by Princess Cherista - at 2015.03.11 18:45:43
|
8. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
PotatoOverdose wrote: Anyone that can be assed to defend their space will succeed. WELL DONE, FULL MARKS SHERLOCK. But who wants to chase interceptors around for 4 hours a night or whatever the primetime is for no fight and no kills. Do you??
- by Princess Cherista - at 2015.03.09 19:05:32
|
9. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Let only battleships and above have enough power grid for an entosis link. Wheres the risk and reward if you can fit a sov laser to a frigate? At least battleships would be used for something again.
- by Princess Cherista - at 2015.03.09 19:03:57
|
10. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Promiscuous Female wrote: PotatoOverdose wrote: Look, even if you don't believe the rail boats (and the better arty and beam boats) can make intys squish at 100+ (and they do), the Cerberus can be fit to hit past 140km with RLML. I trust...
- by Princess Cherista - at 2015.03.09 18:07:01
|
11. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Promiscuous Female wrote: would like to see some eft fits/graphs of any of those tracking an interceptor at long range (150km or so) They would have to lock it first before it warps off.
- by Princess Cherista - at 2015.03.09 17:52:40
|
12. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Guys I got it. Dont let the sov laser be fitted to fast, agile, nullified, uncatchable ships like an interceptor = problem solved. Highsec and lowsec guys who say inty gangs are easily countered and have no combat viability when fitted for speed ...
- by Princess Cherista - at 2015.03.09 16:58:18
|
13. BREAKING NEWS 250b THEFT from Goonswarm - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
all i saw was a screenshot of 64b in ships...jus sayin
- by Princess Cherista - at 2015.03.09 04:18:39
|
14. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I bet if they eliminated the white noise from highsec scrubs this thread would drop to 50 pages
- by Princess Cherista - at 2015.03.08 19:35:00
|
15. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
The uncatchable interceptor has without a doubt been the worst change in recent years
- by Princess Cherista - at 2015.03.05 00:09:20
|
16. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Lady Zarrina wrote: Mr Omniblivion wrote: We would burn null to the ground. And you seem to assume no one will be attacking all the empty space you leave behind Except goons dont leave empty space behind even in full blown total eve s...
- by Princess Cherista - at 2015.03.04 20:07:30
|
17. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Arrendis wrote: How are those ESSs working out for inciting small-scale PVP while improving the value of null-space? Most people i know tried to use and like ESS but it was just too annoying to deal with so they quit using it and accepted be...
- by Princess Cherista - at 2015.03.04 18:27:05
|
18. Do these sov changes mean smaller groups can get a foothold? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Greg Inglis wrote: As coalitions hold vast swathes of relatively empty and "unused" space, does this mean that smaller fish could get a foothold due to the requirement of mindless grinding being removed? Edit: After further thinking, I reali...
- by Princess Cherista - at 2015.03.04 18:04:09
|
19. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Summer 2015: our inties and nullified no-commit fits will blot out the sun
- by Princess Cherista - at 2015.03.04 17:24:43
|
20. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Aryth wrote: Summary: This is so weighted to attacking and not the defenders I do not believe it will promote the real growth and sandcastle building you want. Instead it means anyone organized, big, and with manpower is going to grief the livi...
- by Princess Cherista - at 2015.03.04 16:29:34
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |